Thời gian làm việc: Từ 08h00 - 20h00

Dịch vụ y tế chất lượng
Nơi bạn đặt chọn niềm tin

Hotline tư vấn:

03.56.56.52.52

( Làm việc cả t7, CN & Lễ Tết )

banner
banner

For each and every evaluation mentioned sexual habits, condom fool around with and you can psychosocial circumstances connected with condom explore (for example, condom play with worry about-efficacy)

Nếu không có thời gian chat hãy gọi đến số Hotline:016.56.56.52.52

Hoặc nhập lại số điện thoại
Bác Sĩ Sẽ Gọi Lại Cho Bạn!

For each and every evaluation mentioned sexual habits, condom fool around with and you can psychosocial circumstances connected with condom explore (for example, condom play with worry about-efficacy)

We constructed multivariable Poisson regression designs with strong error variances so you’re able to estimate the latest relative risks (RR) and you will relevant 95% CIs in order to determine if the specified SCT constructs, and you will group and you will intervention parameters had been of worry about-reported condom play with for a change sex work

The newest SITC demo is actually presented out-of 2003 so you’re able to sex dating sites 2005, at around three in public areas funded STI clinics in the usa. Up to forty 100 medical center patients often seen a concept-mainly based intervention films during wishing space, or otherwise not; solutions is actually centered on its clinic head to big date.9 The behavioral comparison component of the bigger SITC demo is actually a low-randomised manage demo in which select medical center patients was basically greet to join throughout the band of clients exactly who attended clinic prepared bedroom while in the the study months. For it study, we made use of investigation off a subset out-of people exactly who done the fresh behavioural testing one another shortly after the directory medical center go to (baseline) as well as 90 days pursue-right up. As a whole, 217 persons was forgotten to adhere to-right up, 130 just weren’t sexually effective at the go after-right up, and you will ten was basically omitted using this analysis due to incomplete otherwise forgotten demographic suggestions. The remainder 1252 participants had been included in the investigation.

Participants acquired a reward value $35–$forty five during the enrolment/baseline see and you can a reward really worth $45–$60 at the follow-upwards, based area. The value of these types of bonuses considers the full time spent at infirmary as well as relevant will cost you out-of participation, for example happen to be the fresh infirmary web site, childcare preparations, and you may works go out destroyed.

The fresh behavioral tests was indeed held having fun with an audio/computers assisted thinking-interviews (A-CASI) technical (QDS, Nova Lookup Team, Bethesda, Maryland). Expected here at the three months pursue-upwards head to, the top consequences are care about-claimed condom play with at the most previous intimate find. I selected this time physique (web browser, history gender work) once the thinking-stated intimate records and you will condom play with are thought to be a great deal more credible and less expected to remember prejudice whenever specific and you may current.ten I selected SCT constructs once the prospective issues affecting condom use (along with expected from the 3 months go after-upwards visit), together with condom explore self-effectiveness, self-handle worry about-efficacy, intimate worry about-efficacy, hedonistic condom benefit expectancies, asked lover reaction consequences and have now risk impact; all the was basically asked at the 3-day follow-upwards visit.8 , eleven , a dozen Each construct, responses with the relevant issues was opposite-scored if required (in a fashion that most of the inquiries and you may responses had been in identical advice, in the event that negatively or definitely phrased), upcoming responses had been cumulated, averaged right after which recalculated to help you a digital variable to point both a confident (1) or ambivalent/bad (0) thinking to your condom play with (desk step 1). Like, for every single theoretic construct, in the event that a respondent’s average rating try more than 2, it was recalculated so you can ‘1′. In the event that a great respondent’s average rating is 2 or lower than, then score are recalculated to ‘0′ in order to make a digital changeable demonstrating either a confident (1) or ambivalent/poor attitude towards condom fool around with (0). I checked out activities having each other rescored and you may unscored constructs. Just like the parameters which were statistically extreme don’t alter, i decided to utilize the digital coded parameters. We analyzed interior structure for each and every create as well as Cronbach’s ?scores were >0.80.

Analytical data

I made use of matters and you will rates to help you identify the sociodemographic and you may notice-said condom fool around with services (desk 2). Particularly, six activities were built (desk step 1), each SCT build and you may risk effect (1=self-effectiveness, 2=self-handle mind-efficacy, 3=sexual self-effectiveness, 4= hedonistic consequences expectancies, 5=mate asked effects and you can six=chance feeling), and then we assessed the consequences of each and every toward stated condom play with for a change sex operate. The new personal cognitive constructs had been evaluated due to the fact proceeded to your four-section balances (study not shown) and also as dichotomous variables. This new constructs was in fact subsequent evaluated into the unadjusted designs, immediately after which again immediately following adjusting to own demographic and read-related variables (bill out-of intervention, data webpages, decades, battle, sex, relationship standing, degree and sexual orientation). Analyses was indeed performed with SAS V.9.step three (SAS Institute Inc, Cary, Vermont, USA).

TIN LIÊN QUAN

HẠNG MỤC ĐIỀU TRỊ
THỜI GIAN LÀM VIỆC

Thời gian làm việc:

07:30 - 20:00

Hotline:

03.56.56.52.52

ẢNH TRONG BÀI VIẾT